Within the vast and varied landscape of socialist-era cinema, Albanian film stands as one of the least explored and most enigmatic national cinemas of Central and Eastern Europe. Viktor Gjika’s Rrugë te Bardha / White Paths (1974, Albania) emerges as a crucial text for reassessing the aesthetic and ideological complexities of Albanian socialist cinema under Enver Hoxha’s authoritarian regime. Produced by Kinostudio Shqipëria e Re during a period marked by severe cultural isolation and ideological rigidity, the film defies simplistic categorisations of socialist cinema as mere propaganda or formal stagnation. Instead, Gjika crafts a cinematic work marked by poetic minimalism, elliptical narrative, and rich symbolic textures that both navigate and quietly subvert the demands of state ideology.
The film centres on Deda, a solitary telephone line repairman who traverses Albania’s harsh mountainous terrain to maintain the fragile communication networks binding isolated communities. His journey unfolds in an unforgiving winter landscape, where the pervasive snow is not only an environmental fact but a powerful visual metaphor. It evokes isolation, disconnection, and the severe conditions under which the regime’s promises of solidarity and progress are tested. The title White Paths itself holds layered significance – referencing the literal snow-covered routes Deda must traverse and the metaphorical moral and spiritual path marked by endurance, sacrifice, and silent resistance that he embodies.
From the outset, Gjika introduces a striking visual motif: a long, unbroken sequence of telephone poles stretching endlessly across snow-filled plains. These poles symbolise more than technological progress; they evoke fragility and precarity, with wires vulnerable to frost and breakage, requiring constant maintenance. Within the highly controlled communication infrastructure of Hoxha’s Albania, where surveillance and censorship were omnipresent, this fragile network operates as a powerful metaphor for both connection and control. Mario Slugan has noted that filmmakers in Eastern Europe often employed formal devices such as visual metaphor and narrative ellipsis to convey political critique under repressive regimes (Slugan 2013). Gjika’s film aligns with this tradition through its sparse dialogue and evocative sound design, in which natural sounds - the crunch of boots in snow, the crackle of failing wires, the wind’s whisper - become narrative agents, filling the spaces where speech falls silent.
Deda is far removed from the archetypal socialist hero who exults in ideological zeal or overt action. His work is quiet, uncelebrated, and performed with solemn dedication. His exchanges with Zana, the telephone operator, provide brief moments of warmth and humour that humanise both characters, contrasting with his otherwise isolated existence. Yet their affection remains suspended and intangible, mediated solely through fragile wires, reinforcing the film’s pervasive themes of distance and longing. One of the film’s most striking sequences shows Deda climbing a telephone pole in the midst of a fierce snowstorm to reconnect a line, allowing an ambulance to be summoned for a sick woman. This scene resonates on multiple levels: it is a nod to socialist ideals of state efficiency and care, but it also elevates Deda’s labour to the realm of the sacred, as a kind of secular martyrdom enacted through endurance and self-sacrifice.
Notably, the film’s closing image, Deda alone, frozen atop a telephone pole with arms outstretched, evokes unmistakable Christian iconography. This cruciform posture, together with Zana’s description of him as an ever-present but unseen force, invests the protagonist with the aura of a secular saint. Such symbolism is striking given Albania’s official atheism under Hoxha, when religious expression was criminalised and cultural memory suppressed. Gjika’s daring incorporation of spiritual allegory serves both as a creative act of defiance and as an effort to reclaim suppressed cultural narratives. Anikó Imre has identified this interweaving of religious and national allegories of endurance as characteristic of dissident aesthetics in Eastern European socialist cinema (Imre 2012). In this light, White Paths can be seen as a profound meditation on the spiritual costs of life under authoritarianism, where silence and sacrifice become modes of survival and resistance.
Gjika deepens this spiritual subtext through his juxtaposition of Deda’s quiet devotion with the ostentatious performances of a local poet vying for Zana’s affection. Whereas the poet expresses emotion through dramatic verses and public display, Deda’s love is rendered through his acts of care and connection, unfulfilled yet steadfast. This contrast echoes the broader tension between the visible and the invisible, the public and the private, that permeates the film. The cinematography often isolates Deda in vast, snow-laden landscapes, underscoring his liminal position – between earth and sky, presence, and absence, duty and desire.
White Paths stands apart within Albanian cinema of its era, which frequently glorified collectivist achievements in factories or agriculture, by embracing a symbolically rich minimalism. Its emotional tone is restrained, and its ideological critique veiled but incisive. Gjika neither offers uncritical celebration nor outright condemnation of the regime; instead, he crafts a nuanced portrait of human perseverance within systemic constraints. Deda’s final sacrifice, his death while upholding fragile communication lines, transforms personal tragedy into a collective symbol of continuity and resilience. The film’s quiet yet radical meditation on endurance, love, and silence challenges prevailing socialist realist narratives by elevating individual vulnerability as a form of political and spiritual defiance.
Throughout the film, the snow itself functions almost as a third character – symbolising purity, repression, silence, and death. It muffles sounds, erases traces, and isolates the characters, while simultaneously imparting a strange visual serenity. Gjika’s cinematography transforms this harsh environment into a poetic landscape where meaning accrues not through explicit dialogue but through visual juxtaposition and carefully choreographed gestures. His style recalls Eastern European auteurs like Andrei Tarkovsky and Miklós Jancsó, although Gjika’s allegorical approach remains deeply rooted in Albania’s specific political and geographical realities.
Gjika also explores gender dynamics in White Paths, particularly through Zana and other women working at the telephone exchange. Their emotional labour – maintaining connections and offering warmth – is presented as essential, even heroic, though often invisible within the narrative. This subtle focus challenges broader patriarchal norms in Albanian society and provides a rare cinematic attention to female resilience and professional agency within a male-dominated labour force.
At its core, White Paths confronts multiple contradictions: Is Deda a martyr or a model worker? Is his death a tragedy or a necessary sacrifice? Does the telephone line connect or surveil? These tensions form the film’s ethical and formal core, inviting viewers to engage in what Jacques Rancière calls a dissensus, a break from consensus reality where competing interpretations coexist (Rancière 2009). Rather than delivering a clear ideological message, Gjika’s film opens a space for reflection, grief, and recognition.
In contrast to the quiet austerity and spiritual introspection of White Paths, Viktor Gjika’s Gjeneral Gramafoni / The General Gramophone (1978, Albania) immerses the viewer in a world of amplified sound, satirical spectacle, and historical allegory. Set in 1930s Albania during the waning years of the monarchy, the film unfolds as a folkloric fable centred on Halit Berati, an eccentric and passionate villager obsessed with building a colossal gramophone powerful enough to awaken the national spirit. This quest to broadcast patriotic songs across the mountains becomes a metaphor for both the unifying power and the illusions of nationalist ideology.
Stylistically, The General Gramophone diverges markedly from White Paths. While the earlier film employed a sparse audio landscape, here, sound is omnipresent and deliberately exaggerated. Speeches, folk songs, cheers, and mechanical noises clash and overlap in a carefully crafted soundscape that draws attention to its own artificiality. The gramophone itself, absurdly oversized and visually surreal, is a symbol of grandiose ambition and inevitable failure. Gjika stages its construction with a mixture of slapstick humour and reverence, imbuing technical setbacks with allegorical weight. This blend of comedy and melancholy creates a tonal complexity that allows the film to critique and celebrate simultaneously.
The gramophone functions as a multifaceted metaphor, representing not only national identity, but also the mediated nature of collective memory. As the machine plays archival songs from Albania’s national revival and independence wars, villagers are momentarily transported into a heroic past. Yet the film subtly undermines this nostalgia; the recordings are often scratchy, distorted, or drowned out by noise, suggesting that history itself is fragile and mediated through imperfect technology. Gjika refuses to present a straightforward celebration of patriotism, instead inviting viewers to question how memory is constructed and manipulated by both ideology and media.
Halit Berati’s escalating obsession with his project drives the film’s satirical edge. He believes that if the gramophone is loud enough, it will reach the capital and win the approval of government officials. This conviction pushes him to increasingly ludicrous extremes, recruiting villagers, engineers, and poets in a half-hearted coalition of enthusiasm and coercion. Their participation mirrors the mechanisms of propaganda and conformity in authoritarian regimes, where collective action is often compelled by social pressure rather than genuine belief. Gjika exposes these dynamics with a knowing irony that never fully dismisses his characters’ hopes or delusions.
The mise-en-scène of The General Gramophone reinforces its allegorical intent. The frame is crowded with oversized flags, portraits, and slogans from Albania’s interwar monarchy - symbols of authority and nationalism that appear distorted, misplaced, or in disrepair. This visual playfulness signals a quiet ridicule of authoritarian aesthetics and the theatricality of political spectacle. A memorable sequence in which the gramophone emits a deafening screech that shatters a window and scatters birds encapsulates this ambivalence: the spectacle of sound becomes both a triumph and a destructive force.
This reflexivity extends to the film’s engagement with media theory and the politics of representation. Gjika foregrounds the processes of mediation themselves, exposing how cinema, sound, and performance construct realities rather than merely reflect them. This thematic concern aligns with the intellectual currents of 1970s media theory, which interrogated the relationship between technology, ideology, and authenticity. Through The General Gramophone, Gjika anticipates questions that would become central to media studies: How do technological means shape political narratives? How does reproduction alter the authenticity of cultural expressions? How can cinema reveal its own persuasive mechanisms?
The thematic bridge between The General Gramophone and White Paths is most clearly drawn through their shared exploration of sacrifice, though with starkly different tonal registers. Deda’s death in White Paths is solemn and Christ-like, an emblem of quiet martyrdom and spiritual endurance. In contrast, Halit Berati’s downfall is farcical and chaotic. The film culminates in the gramophone’s collapse during its public debut, physically destroying the apparatus and dispersing the crowd. This collapse symbolises the implosion of auditory nationalism itself - the failure of grand nationalist projects that rely more on spectacle than substance. Yet Halit Berati’s persistent conviction, even in defeat, reflects an ambiguous mixture of faith and delusion characteristic of Gjika’s nuanced approach to character and ideology.
The film also offers a critique of masculinity as performance. Halit Berati embodies a bombastic, theatrical masculinity, demanding attention and commanding public stages. His self-transformation into a folk-orator exposes patriarchal structures underpinning nationalist and communist rhetoric, where authority is maintained through repetition, volume, and spectacle rather than ethical legitimacy or genuine collective will. Gjika’s portrayal is neither dismissive nor celebratory, but reveals the fragility and performativity of such masculine authority, undermined by mechanical failures and public scepticism.
Despite its overtly comedic tone, The General Gramophone affords moments of quiet introspection. One poignant scene shows Halit Berati listening alone to an old recording, illuminated by the gramophone’s glowing horn. His expression is not one of triumph but of longing and vulnerability. This nuanced depiction permits the coexistence of vanity and sincerity, folly, and profundity, allowing the film to humanise its protagonist without excusing his excesses. It is in this ambivalence that Gjika’s generosity as a filmmaker is most apparent.
Formally, The General Gramophone is more dynamically edited than White Paths. Gjika employs quicker cuts, wider camera movements, and a richer sound mix, reflecting the film’s thematic emphasis on noise, spectacle, and mediation. Both films, however, showcase Gjika’s mastery of cinematic language as a vehicle for metaphor. If White Paths is a haiku carved in ice: concise, austere, and haunting, The General Gramophone is a carnival mirror: playful, distorted, and multifaceted. Together, they testify to Gjika’s artistic range and his capacity to engage complex ideological terrains with aesthetic precision.
Gjika’s cinema neither openly defies nor simply obeys the political context of its creation. Instead, it embodies a form of coded resistance folded into the fabric of narrative, sound, rhythm, and visual form. His films offer more than historical documentation; they provide meditations on the power and limitations of communication under authoritarianism. They reveal cinema as a site of negotiation – between propaganda and subversion, ideology, and artistry, silence and speech.
The legacy of White Paths and The General Gramophone is multifaceted. Both serve as invaluable historical documents preserving the textures of Albanian life and culture under isolation and repression. Their ethnographic sensibility and symbolic richness contribute to a collective memory that resists erasure by authoritarian narratives. Moreover, these films exemplify how filmmakers in tightly controlled environments employed allegory, metaphor, and formal innovation to circumvent censorship and articulate layered meanings.
In Albanian cultural discourse, these films have become focal points in ongoing debates about the legacy of communist-era cinema. Some argue for their restriction or banning, citing their propagandistic origins and the risk of glamorising a repressive past. Others champion their preservation and advocate for critical engagement with them, emphasising their artistic merit, historical value, and the nuanced critiques embedded within. Gjika’s films, with their oscillation between complicity and dissent, challenge simplistic binary readings and invite complex interpretations.
Recent years have seen a revival of interest in Gjika’s work, reflecting a broader scholarly and cultural movement to reclaim marginalised film histories and explore cinema’s role as a site of ideological and aesthetic negotiation. His films remain vital reference points for scholars exploring socialist cinema, cultural memory, and the fraught transitions of post-totalitarian societies. Gjika’s cinematic language – marked by poetic imagery, symbolic resonance, and ethical ambiguity – invites ongoing dialogue about cinema’s capacity to mediate history, identity, and power.
More Raça
University of Prishtina
more.raca@uni-pr.edu
More Raça is an acclaimed filmmaker and scholar from Kosovo. She holds a PhD in Film Theory, Arts, and Television. She is a professor of Film Directing at the University of Prishtina, where she inspires and guides the next generation of filmmakers. Her debut feature, Andromeda Galaxy, won the Glocal in Progress award at the San Sebastián Film Festival and premiered at Sarajevo. She has been selected for prestigious international programs, including Berlinale Talents and the Zurich Film Festival Academy. As a Fulbright Scholar, More conducted research in film pedagogy at the New York Film Academy in Los Angeles. She also serves as a consultant for American Councils for International Education and has been a guest lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania. Her work centres on storytelling, social change, and empowering new voices in cinema.
Gjika, Viktor. 1974. Rrugë te Bardha / White Paths. Kinostudio Shqipëria e Re.
Gjika, Viktor. 1978. Gjeneral Gramafoni / The General Gramophone. Kinostudio Shqipëria e Re.
Imre, Anikó. 2012. “Dissident Aesthetics in Albanian Socialist Cinema.” Journal of Eastern European Film 5 (2): 45–68.
Rancière, Jacques. 2009. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London.
Slugan, Mario. 2013. “The Rhetorics of Interpretation and Žižek’s Approach to Film.” Slavic Review 72 (4): 728–749.
Raça, More. 2025. “Film Review of Viktor Gjika’s Films”. Apparatus. Film, Media and Digital Cultures in Central and Eastern Europe 21. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17892/app.2025.00021.394.
URL: http://www.apparatusjournal.net/
Copyright: The text of this article has been published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This licence does not apply to the media referenced in the article, which are subject to the individual rights owner's terms.